Assignments


 

 

Assignment # 1: Analyzing An Argument (Length 6 pages)
Due date: October 01
In “We Need to Talk about an Injustice,” Bryan Stevenson critically examines America’s criminal justice system. He argues that this system
is characterized by racial bias and inequality, and that reform is needed. Stevenson suggests there are connections between the history
of slavery and the current era of mass incarceration, in which a disproportionate number of black Americans are incarcerated. “We Need
to Talk about an Injustice” is a TED talk Stevenson gave in March 2012.

Bryan Stevenson is the founder and director of the Equal Justice Initiative (EJI). Operating on a shoestring budget, this organization has
taken on the cases of poor and marginalized people, and reversed death penalties for dozens of prisoners. Stevenson is the recipient of
the MacArthur Foundation "Genius" Grant, and was named one of Time's 100 Most Influential People. Stevenson is a law
professor at New York University School of Law. His memoir, Just Mercy, was recently turned into a popular movie.

In this essay you will analyze and evaluate Stevenson’s argument. Your paper should do the following: 

  1. Describe Stevenson’s project and argument, and his most important or interesting claims.
  2. Analyze and evaluate Stevenson’s use of evidence and reasoning to support his argument.
  3. Analyze how Stevenson appeals to his audience’s emotions, establishes credibility, and deals with opposing views.
  4. Use an effective structure that carefully guides the reader from one idea to the next, and be thoroughly edited so
    that sentences are readable and appropriate for an academic audience.

 

Assignment # 2: Analyzing Strategies (Length 6-7 pages)
Due date: November 03 

For this assignment, you will read two texts that make arguments about who we are, how we represent our history, and how we could
reimagine both. You will examine and compare strategies these two authors use to persuade their audiences.

Nikole Hannah-Jones’ text, from the 1619 Project, invites us to reconsider how we think about our history, and how we understand the
contributions of black Americans to U.S democracy. Hannah-Jones’ text won the Pulitzer Prize in 2019, and has had a significant cultural
impact.

Mitch Landrieu’s text is a speech he gave explaining why he decided to remove Confederate statues from the center of New Orleans.
Landrieu is the mayor of New Orleans, and the question of what to do with Confederate statues has been a long-running debate in
the city. Landrieu’s speech, which was given in May, 2017, is about race, history, and American identity.

Your paper should do the following: 

  1. Describe the authors’ main claims and support for those claims.
  2. Identify rhetorical strategies used to support each author’s argument, and analyze how these strategies work to persuade their
    audience.
  3. Evaluate the extent to which these strategies effectively persuade the intended audiences, and analyze assumptions the authors
    make about those audiences. 

 

Assignment # 3: Analyzing and Evaluating Multiple Texts (7-8 pages)
Due date: December 12

In this assignment you will present an argument of your own. Your paper will describe the question, issue, or problem you wish to address.
It will describe how some other authors have approached the issue (what Graff and Birkenstein call the “they say” move in academic
writing) and then present your contribution to it. Your contribution may extend, complicate, illustrate, challenge or qualify the arguments
that other authors have made. 

Your paper may use texts and topics we have discussed earlier in the class. Or, it can explore one of the other “crises” and debates that
are currently occurring (examples: a) the pandemic, b) police reform, c) race and racial justice, d) confederate monuments, e) social media
and democracy.)

Your paper will focus on two or three texts that take different positions on the issue/problem. You will describe points of connection,
difference, and disagreement, and evaluate relative strengths and weaknesses. You will present your own argument. Your argument
should contribute to the conversation in some way – by extending, illustrating, complicating, or challenging what the other authors say.

Your paper should conclude by addressing the significance of the issue, discussing its implications, proposing a solution, or suggesting
what can be learned from examining this issue. 

 

Note: In class we will discuss ways of customizing this assignment, including projects that students can work on both individually
and in groups.

 

 

Alternate Options for Paper 3: How Did We Get Here? What Needs to change? How 
Does my Experience Fit in? (Entering the Conversation)

 

In unit 3 you will add your voice or perspective to a conversation. This can be in the form of an argument, personal narrative/experience, or “analytic review.” These three options are described below. Note that some of these options could be collaborative projects. So, if you and one or more classmates want to do a collaborative project, talk to me.
 
Option 1: the “argument” approach.

Your paper will describe a question, issue, or problem. You can use the authors we have already read to do this, or you can select different ones. Your paper will describe how a few authors have approached the issue (what Graff and Birkenstein call the “they say” move in academic writing) and then present your argument. Your argument should contribute to the conversation in some way – by extending, illustrating, complicating, or challenging what the other authors say. Your paper should conclude by addressing the significance of the issue, discussing its implications, proposing a solution, or suggesting what can be learned from examining this issue. You may use texts and topics we have discussed earlier in class. Or, you can explore one of the other debates currently taking place – for example: a) the pandemic, b) police reform, c) race and racial justice, d) confederate monuments, e) the concept of “systemic racism,” etc. See the wiki for texts on these topics.

 

Here are some possible ideas for option 1 (you can suggest others).

Option 2: personal narrative/experience approach

Your paper will draw on your own experiences during the pandemic to construct a personal narrative. You can focus on a particular experience or set of experiences – your own or those around you – to share a perspective on what happened. The paper should also connect your narrative to other narratives/texts in some way. You could relate your experience to “analytic” texts (texts that make an argument) or to other personal narratives. 


You could use the Washington Posts’ Voices From The Pandemic series as a model (see below for more information on this option). This is a set of short essays in which people reflect on their experiences with the pandemic. These stories could be used as models for a writing project that combines personal narrative, reflection, and analysis. 

 

One way of structuring the paper would be to read some of these stories, summarize some elements of what “They Say,” then provide your own story, including some discussion of how your account connects or contrasts with these other stories.


Note: you may need a Washington Post account to access these stories, so I have created a Google doc with a sampling of these stories that you can access without an account).

 

“Voices from the Pandemic”: What is your pandemic story, and how does it relate to the accounts of others?  “Voices from the Pandemic” is an oral history of covid-19 published in the Washington Post. In this series ordinary people recount their pandemic experiences over the last 6 months. You could compose an account similar to one of these accounts, and also talk about how your personal narrative connects with one or more of these other stories – how it echoes, contrast, extends, complicates or challenges the account in some way.   

The paper could thus become a way of organizing your experiences of the pandemic into a personal story, to help you make sense of some part of it. At the same time, you would analyze how your story relates to the writing of others. You could use the Washington Post articles, or you could talk about your story in relation to another text, movie, or documentary, related to the pandemic.

 

Here are some examples of Voices From The Pandemic stories: 


Option 3: analytic review

You paper will review a documentary or movie that addresses the pandemic, issues of racial justice, or some other topic that is currently being discussed. You could also compare two documentaries or movies that address a similar topic. Your paper will summarize the film, describe how critics have responded to it (if relevant), evaluate some strengths and weaknesses, and present your thoughts on the film. To present your thoughts on the film you could refer to a few outside texts, perhaps discussing how these texts can be used to extend, illustrate, complicate, or challenge the film. Alternatively, you could connect the movie to your own experiences.

If you are interested in exploring the pandemic you could consider documentaries such as Totally Under Control or “America’s Pandemic,” the movie Contagion, or TED talks on the topic. If you are interested in exploring issues of racial justice you could consider The 13th, Just Mercy, Crime and Punishment, Whose Streets?, or TED talks on the topic.

 

 

 

More Alternatives

If there is enough interest, we could watch one of these three films outside class, and then devote a class to discussing it and how one could write about it:

  1. Totally Under Control, "An in-depth look at how the United States government handled the response to the COVID-19 outbreak." The movie is by Alex Gibney and is critical of the government response. It interviews whistle blowers and people in scientific agencies who were closely involved in the pandemic response.

  2. Contagion. This 2011 movie eerily predicts much of what happened during the current pandemic. It could be interesting to discuss how the move echoes the present, as well as where it differs.

  3. “America’s Pandemic.” A documentary  by the Washington Post that ”explores a failed response to the coronavirus pandemic that’s left 225,000 Americans dead.” 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Alternate Assignment Ideas

For units 2 and 3 you may decide to use different texts and reimagine the assignments. Here are some examples of alternatives
you could consider if they seem interesting, but you are welcome to come up with your own. 

 

The Rhetoric of Cultural and Personal Narrative
There are a set of short, popular texts that examine how cultural narratives have persuasive effects. Students could examine these
cultural narratives, but also consider them in relation to personal narratives that circulate amongst their friends and family. These
texts could be used to a) get at some of the issues of racial justice covered in units 2 and 3 above, but in an indirect way, b) allow students
to bring more of their recent personal experiences into the assignments, and c) move the writing assignments toward consideration
of popular culture and thus to slightly more "fun" topics. 


Here are the texts:

 

Some of the texts above could be used in unit two to examine persuasive strategies. They could be used to invite students
to think about how the stories around them (personal and cultural) make use of persuasive strategies, and encourage us
to see the world in particular ways. 

 

Some of these texts could instead (or in addition) be used in unit three to explore a "conversation." This could allow students
to begin with a personal narrative, or a set of personal experiences, then consider how this intersects with larger stories about
the crises we are experiencing. 

 

 

Using a video from the Media Education Foundation  

The Media Education Foundation has documentaries on many aspects of popular culture, from rap, to music videos, to anime. 

It also has many videos that explore race, class and gender. You could use one of these for units 2 or 3. (Note that 
you can access these for free through the SDSU library's Kanopy service.

I've sometimes used The Codes of Gender: Identity and Performance in Pop Culture. This documentary provides viewers with a
"lens" for understanding patterns in advertisements. It argues that advertisements use a small set of cultural "codes" to represent
men and women, and this shapes the way we think about gender. The documentary suggests male and female bodies are
portrayed very differently, and these differences reveal important cultural norms.

 

I created a summary of the documentary and a set of discussion questions.


The documentary is from 2009, and looks at traditional broadcast and print media. It does not consider recent online media or online 
advertisements.  But since 2009 we have seen huge changes in the way people consume media. This video could be used as a 
"lens" to look at online media - for example, at male and female instagram stars, or at the ads in online men's/women's magazines
(Students could examine the poses of Instagram model and celebrity Alahna Ly, and compare these to the poses shown in Gentleman
Quarterly's "20 hottest male models on Instagram") At the same time, students could see if today's advertisements have changed in 
ways that challenge the framework, and suggest the analysis needs to be updated or revised.

 

Thus students could begin with what Goffman/Jhally says, then present their own contribution to the conversation.

Students could also draw on some recent research to help with their projects. For example, "Advertising Stereotypes
and Gender Representation in Social Networking Sites" might be a helpful text. 

 

There are 2 versions of the video, the full version, which is 1 hour and 13 minutes, and the abridged version which is 46 minutes.

A pdf transcript of the video is available for students to use.