• If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • You already know Dokkio is an AI-powered assistant to organize & manage your digital files & messages. Very soon, Dokkio will support Outlook as well as One Drive. Check it out today!

View
 

Assignments

This version was saved 3 years, 8 months ago View current version     Page history
Saved by Chris Werry
on July 28, 2020 at 6:50:52 pm
 

 

 

Assignment # 1: Analyzing An Argument (Length 6 pages)
Due date:
 October 01
In “We Need to Talk about an Injustice,” Bryan Stevenson critically examines America’s criminal justice system. He argues that this system
is characterized by racial bias and inequality, and that reform is needed. Stevenson suggests there are connections between the history
of slavery and the current era of mass incarceration, in which a disproportionate number of black Americans are incarcerated. “We Need
to Talk about an Injustice” is a TED talk Stevenson gave in March 2012.

Bryan Stevenson is the founder and director of the Equal Justice Initiative (EJI). Operating on a shoestring budget, this organization has
taken on the cases of poor and marginalized people, and reversed death penalties for dozens of prisoners. Stevenson is the recipient of
the MacArthur Foundation "Genius" Grant, and was named one of Time's 100 Most Influential People. Stevenson is a law
professor at New York University School of Law. His memoir, Just Mercy, was recently turned into a popular movie.

In this essay you will analyze and evaluate Stevenson’s argument. Your paper should do the following: 

  1. Describe Stevenson’s project and argument, and his most important or interesting claims.
  2. Analyze and evaluate Stevenson’s use of evidence and reasoning to support his argument.
  3. Analyze how Stevenson appeals to his audience’s emotions, establishes credibility, and deals with opposing views.
  4. Use an effective structure that carefully guides the reader from one idea to the next, and be thoroughly edited so
    that sentences are readable and appropriate for an academic audience.

 

Assignment # 2: Analyzing Strategies (Length 6-7 pages)
Due date:
 November 03 

For this assignment, you will read two texts that make arguments about who we are, how we represent our history, and how we could
reimagine both. You will examine and compare strategies these two authors use to persuade their audiences.

Nikole Hannah-Jones’ text, from the 1619 Project, invites us to reconsider how we think about our history, and how we understand the
contributions of black Americans to U.S democracy. Hannah-Jones’ text won the Pulitzer Prize in 2019, and has had a significant cultural
impact.

Mitch Landrieu’s text is a speech he gave explaining why he decided to remove Confederate statues from the center of New Orleans.
Landrieu is the mayor of New Orleans, and the question of what to do with Confederate statues has been a long-running debate in
the city. Landrieu’s speech, which was given in May, 2017, is about race, history, and American identity.

Your paper should do the following:
 

  1. Describe the authors’ main claims and support for those claims.
  2. Identify rhetorical strategies used to support each author’s argument, and analyze how these strategies work to persuade their
    audience.
  3. Evaluate the extent to which these strategies effectively persuade the intended audiences, and analyze assumptions the authors
    make about those audiences. 

 

Assignment # 3: Analyzing and Evaluating Multiple Texts (7-8 pages)
Due date:
 December 12

In this assignment you will present an argument of your own. Your paper will describe the question, issue, or problem you wish to address.
It will describe how some other authors have approached the issue (what Graff and Birkenstein call the “they say” move in academic
writing) and then present your contribution to it. Your contribution may extend, complicate, illustrate, challenge or qualify the arguments
that other authors have made. 

Your paper may use texts and topics we have discussed earlier in the class. Or, it can explore one of the other “crises” and debates that
are currently occurring (examples:
a) the pandemic, b) police reform, c) race and racial justice, d) confederate monuments, e) social media
and democracy.)

Your paper will focus on two or three texts that take different positions on the issue/problem. You will describe points of connection,
difference, and disagreement, and evaluate relative strengths and weaknesses. You will present your own argument. Your argument
should contribute to the conversation in some way – by extending, illustrating, complicating, or challenging what the other authors say.

Your paper should conclude by addressing the significance of the issue, discussing its implications, proposing a solution, or suggesting
what can be learned from examining this issue. 

 

Note: In class we will discuss ways of customizing this assignment, including projects that students can work on both individually
and in groups.

 

 

 

Alternate Assignment Ideas

For units 2 and 3 you may decide to use different texts and reimagine the assignments. Here are some examples you could 
consider if they seem interesting. 

 

There are a set of short, popular texts that examine how powerful cultural narratives have persuasive effects. Students

could examine these cultural narratives, but also consider them in relation to personal narratives that circulate amongst
their friends and family. These texts could be used to a) get at some of the issues of racial justice covered in units 2 and 3 above,

but in an indirect way, b) allow students to bring more of their recent personal experiences into the assignments, and c) move
the writing assignments toward consideration of popular culture and thus to slightly more "fun" and possibly engaging

topics. 

Here are the texts:

  • May "The Stories We Tell Ourselves." This short, 2 page text considers how stories are used to persuade, establish an 
    identity/persona, and make sense of the world. 
  • Johann Hari's "The Likely Cause of Addiction Has Been Discovered, and It Is Not What You Think." His TED talk presents
    the same argument. Hari argues that we have been telling "the wrong stories" about addiction, and he essentially makes the case for 
    decriminalizing all drugs. His arguments echo those heard recently about reimagining the criminal justice system. 
    The text is a good one for examining rhetorical strategies, as his strategies are explicit and easy to identify. There is also
    a collection of teaching materials for teaching Hari.
  • Seagal, “Tales from the Cutting Room Floor.” This text is written in the form of a "diary" recounting the writer's experience
    of working on a "Cops-like" reality TV show. Shows like Cops and American Detective, along with shows like Law and 
    Order
    and NYPD Blue, have shaped people's perception of crime and policing. The writer suggests  
     
  • Colin Stokes, How Movies Teach Manhood. TED talk, 20 minutes. This video argues that the stories that surround us in popular 
    culture have a subtle but powerful persuasive force, influencing the way we think about gender roles and identity. This could 
    be used with passages in the textbook that consider how small personal narratives and large cultural narratives are used to persuade. 

    This video could be put in conversation with other texts the explore how we use stories to make sense of the world and ourselves.



    Coffin's "My Father, Out to Sea," and 

 

 

 

  •  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.